Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PUC approves consent calendar, pipeline projects and grant actions in routine vote

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · October 22, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The San Francisco PUC approved the consent calendar and a string of routine items including a three-year contract time extension, a $12,500 MOU amendment for Alameda Creek fisheries, a Proposition 84 grant application, and two pipeline projects with CEQA findings.

At its meeting the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission approved several routine agenda items in a series of voice votes and moved to closed session without taking additional open actions.

Key votes recorded in the meeting minutes:

- Consent calendar (items 9a–f): approved by voice vote after the secretary read the items as routine business. - Item 10: Amendment No. 1 to agreement CS 139 — authorized a three-year time extension with no change to contract value; motion carried by voice vote. - Item 11: Third amendment to the MOU with Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Work Group — authorized the general manager to allocate funding not to exceed $12,500; motion carried by voice vote. - Item 12: Authorization for the general manager to apply for Proposition 84 grant funding — motion carried by voice vote. - Item 13: Approval of project CUW36702 (Peninsula Pipeline Seismic Upgrade Project) and adoption of required CEQA findings — motion carried by voice vote. - Item 14: Approval of project CUW2730502 (San Andreas Pipeline 2 and 3 Improvements) and adoption of CEQA findings — motion carried by voice vote.

Commissioners moved into a closed session to discuss litigation and security matters; the commission later announced no formal action was taken in closed session and approved a motion not to disclose the discussions.

The meeting record shows no roll-call tallies attached to the published motions; votes were recorded in the minutes as carried by voice vote with ayes and no recorded nay votes.