Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Closed Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission votes to move into closed session and later votes for non‑disclosure
Summary
The commission voted to go into closed session for confidential personnel and litigation matters and later voted to withhold disclosure of the closed session discussion under San Francisco Administrative Code section 67.12(a).
The San Francisco Police Commission voted on July 10 to hold a portion of the meeting in closed session to discuss confidential personnel matters and litigation. The presiding officer explained the closed‑session justification as personnel matters protected by the California Constitution and the Police Officers Bill of Rights, and confidential litigation matters under discussion with the city attorney's office.
A motion to hold item 6 in closed session was made and the commission voted 'Aye.' The commission moved into closed session. After reconvening, the commission considered Line Item 7, which required a vote on whether to disclose any part of the closed session discussions pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code section 67.12(a). A motion for non‑disclosure was made by Commissioner Turman and seconded; the motion carried on an "Aye" vote.
The meeting record does not show an expanded roll call or a roll‑call tally with member‑level votes recorded for each action; the minutes record the motion, a second and the 'Aye' outcome for both the closed session vote and the subsequent non‑disclosure vote. No further disclosure was ordered and the meeting was adjourned.
