Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

PUC case study: defective gearbox blamed for tunnel-boring failure; contractor covered extraction costs

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · March 22, 2011
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented a case study of the Alameda Siphon No. 4 project where a tunnel-boring machine failed; after a rapid multi-option assessment the PUC extracted and repaired the MTBM, found a defective gearbox, and reported that the contractor has covered extraction and repair costs so far.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission reviewed on March 22 how staff and contractors handled a tunnel-boring machine failure on the Alameda Siphon No. 4 seismic reliability project.

Julie Labonte, VISTA director, described the $61 million project and recounted that the micro-tunneling boring machine lost the ability to rotate its cutter head 13 days into operations. Staff evaluated four options (open cut, abandon/re-sequence, smaller recovery shaft with in-situ repair, or a larger recovery shaft to extract and shop-repair the machine) and chose to dig a larger recovery shaft. The…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans