Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants propose centralized SFPUC community benefits policy, recommend senior coordination
Summary
Consultants presented a draft definition of community benefits tied to sustainability and ten measurable outcomes, recommending an agency‑wide program coordinated at senior staff level and final recommendations by Dec. 1.
Get email alerts on the Community Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants Darylyn Davis and Bernita Reagan presented the initial findings of a months‑long community‑benefits review and proposed that the SFPUC adopt a centralized, measurable community benefits program overseen at senior staff level. The draft definition ties community benefits to the triple‑bottom‑line — economic strength, environmental sustainability and social equity — and lists ten outcome categories, including stakeholder involvement, workforce development, environmental justice, health, education, land use, arts and cultural programs, diversity and inclusion, and financial/in‑kind contributions.
Davis said the team conducted more than 30 interviews, multiple focus groups and a nationwide scan of utilities; they documented more than 80 existing SFPUC programs and found three program models — decentralized, case‑by‑case, and centralized — and recommended the centralized model for consistency and sustainability. "We think the PUC is way ahead of the curve," she said, and urged clear metrics and consistent reporting.
The consultants recommended senior‑level coordination (the newly announced assistant general manager role was cited as appropriate), strengthened long‑term public involvement, and integration with workforce strategies led by the Office of Economic and Workforce Development. They committed to deliver a final written report and implementation recommendations by Dec. 1, including proposed metrics for measuring outcomes.
