Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance Bonds topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

SFPUC briefed on large upcoming bond sales; counsel warns commissioners about disclosure liabilities

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · June 9, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Disclosure counsel and staff briefed the commission on disclosure duties for upcoming Water System Improvement Program bond sales, noting large projected issuances and the legal risk for material misstatements or omissions; commissioners asked about directors-and-officers insurance and risk management.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission received a securities‑law disclosure briefing ahead of planned bond financings for the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP). Staff said a packet of seven financing documents, including a preliminary official statement and supplemental indenture, will be before the commission at the next meeting.

Todd Reachstrom, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant General Manager, summarized the financing timetable and said large bond sales are projected over the next two years in support of WSIP. Disclosure counsel (identified in the packet) emphasized the commissioners' fiduciary duty to ensure official statements and other materials include no material misstatements or omissions and advised commissioners to review the documents and ask questions about pledged revenue sources, repayment terms, and other long‑term obligations.

Disclosure counsel warned that inadequate disclosure can trigger civil and criminal penalties, investor lawsuits and reputational harm that could impair future access to the municipal bond market. Counsel recommended commissioners use a short question checklist included in the package, rely on the financing team, and closely read the preliminary official statement when it is distributed.

Commissioners raised practical risk management questions. Staff described the PUC's current approach to director and officer liability as primarily a city self‑insurance/self‑retention program and said purchasing stand‑alone public officials D&O coverage is possible; staff agreed to return with indicative market pricing and comparisons to other utilities. Commissioners asked for examples and for the finance team to highlight sections of the official statement they should scrutinize when the packet arrives.

No action was taken at this briefing; staff said the bond documents will appear on the next meeting agenda for formal consideration.