Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
SFPUC staff outlines steps to enable Potrero Power Plant closure, cites $1–4M transmission fix
Summary
SFPUC presented technical and policy options to release Potrero Power Plant from ISO reliability requirements, including installing 2–4 series reactors (estimated $1–4 million), targeted energy efficiency/demand response, and relying on the Transbay cable coming online. Public commenters urged earlier closure of the most polluting unit.
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission staff on May 12 presented a plan for how the city might seek near‑term closure of the Potrero Power Plant while preserving electric reliability. Barbara Hale, assistant general manager for power, told commissioners that California Independent System Operator (Cal ISO) studies show a relatively small summer 2010 reliability gap — roughly 25 megawatts in the ISO’s 2010 scenario, dropping in later years — and that modest transmission changes could eliminate the need for continued ‘must‑run’ contracts for Potrero’s units.
Hale said the plant includes Unit 3, a roughly 206‑megawatt natural‑gas unit with once‑through cooling, and three peaker units (Units 4–6) of about 52 MW each. She described a near‑term proposal to install 2 to 4 series reactors on PG&E’s 115‑kV transmission system at substations such as Futuro or Martin. “A 2 to 4 of them would cost $1 to $4 million,” she said, calling it “a very modest change” that could reroute flows and relieve overloaded lines so the ISO would no longer require Potrero to be held for reliability in some scenarios.
The s…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
