Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SFPUC hears city budget briefing; agency says core services largely insulated
Summary
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission heard a citywide budget briefing from the mayor's office and the comptroller and was told general-fund shortfalls are projected while the PUC’s enterprise budget remains largely outside the general fund; commissioners asked staff to accelerate the PUC budget schedule.
Todd Reitstrom, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s assistant general manager and chief financial officer, briefed commissioners on Nov. 12 on the citywide budget picture provided by the mayor’s office and Comptroller Ben Rosenfield. He said the city’s total proposed budget is about $6.5 billion, with roughly $3.7 billion of that supported by the general fund, and highlighted controller projections showing a possible general‑fund contraction in the tens to hundreds of millions.
Reitstrom told the commission that the controller’s office was projecting a range of shortfalls for the general fund — citing figures such as a $90 million to $125 million contraction for the current year and noting estimates for the following year that have been reported around $250 million. He emphasized that the SFPUC’s enterprise budget “sits outside of that general fund supported” budget and that the commission’s direct exposure today is limited: the general fund provides about $1.65 million to subsidize low‑income water and wastewater bills within the PUC’s roughly $677 million enterprise budget.
Commissioners pressed staff on timing and asked that the PUC move its internal budget timeline earlier so wholesale customers and commissioners have more time to review materials. Reitstrom said staff will accommodate that request and expects to bring documents to the commission for deliberation by February as part of the agency’s internal budget calendar.
The briefing placed the PUC’s planning in the context of a statewide downturn and the city and county’s diversified revenue streams. Reitstrom noted that while some revenue lines (like property tax) have held up, other volatile revenues such as property transfer and payroll taxes may contract, and the mayor and comptroller have asked departments to submit projected budget reductions. He said these requests are aimed at helping the mayor and Board of Supervisors determine where to “tighten our belt.”
The commission did not take formal action on the briefing. The next procedural step is staff providing an updated six‑month calendar and earlier budget rollout materials for commissioner consideration.
