Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Residents and commissioners press for alternatives as SFPUC weighs in‑city peaker plants

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · September 25, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Sept. 25 SFPUC meeting, residents from Bayview/Hunters Point and several commissioners urged the utility to prioritize alternatives after a Cal ISO report said reliability could be met without in‑city generation; community groups filed a federal suit opposing proposed combustion‑turbine peaker plants.

San Francisco — Residents, advocacy groups and a majority of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission members used a public comment period and a Commission workshop Sept. 25 to press staff for alternatives to building combustion‑turbine (CT) “peaker” plants inside the city.

Commissioner Michael Sklar read from a July California Independent System Operator (Cal ISO) packet, citing a sentence in the study stating that “options are available to meet the required level of electric system reliability in San Francisco without relying on generation in the city.” Sklar said the Cal ISO materials and recent technical packets warrant a rigorous, non‑political review before the city proceeds with in‑city CT construction.

Community speakers described the proposal as a local health and environmental justice issue. Darrell Cockerham of APRI said…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans