Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Settlement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves settlement tied to Lesinski case, votes nondisclosure after closed session
Summary
After retiring into closed session to discuss multiple legal and personnel matters, the commission returned to approve a consent‑calendar settlement in Lesinski et al v. City and County of San Francisco (Super. Ct. No. 436254) and voted for nondisclosure of closed‑session discussions.
Get email alerts on the Legal Settlement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Police Commission retired into closed session during its Oct. 7 meeting to consider legal counsel conference items and personnel exceptions related to disciplinary matters.
The closed session included item 7a — a conference with legal counsel regarding Lesinski et al v. City and County of San Francisco, Superior Court No. 436254 — and items 7b–7e, which were personnel exceptions tied to stipulated dispositions and appeals in multiple case files. The commission moved to hold closed session and cleared the room; the motion carried 'without objection.'
Upon returning to open session, the commission voted to withhold disclosure of the closed‑session discussion and approved the consent calendar. The consent calendar included a recommendation that the Board of Supervisors approve a settlement in Lesinski et al v. City and County of San Francisco (Super. Ct. No. 436254); the commission approved the item unanimously.
Specific details of the settlement and the substance of the closed‑session deliberations were not disclosed in open session; the commission explicitly moved for nondisclosure in accordance with the Government Code and administrative code sections cited during the meeting.
Next steps: The settlement is on the consent calendar for the Board of Supervisors as noted by commission staff; the commission indicated no additional public details would be released from the closed session on Oct. 7.
