Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civics Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Police Commission accepts consent reports, plans master calendar for discipline cases; public commenter alleges Northern Station misconduct
Summary
The Police Commission accepted two routine reports, heard the OCC director—s statistical update, agreed to pursue a master calendar to clear disciplinary backlogs and heard a public comment alleging threatening conduct by a Northern Station officer.
At its July 15 public meeting the San Francisco Police Commission accepted the consent calendar — which included the Police Commission—s second‑quarter closed‑session disciplinary report (the Veronese report) and the Office of Citizens Complaints (OCC) second‑quarter statistical report — by motion and without recorded objection.
The OCC director reported that from January 1 to date the OCC had opened 547 cases and closed 533, sustained 25 cases, and had 404 pending (68 from 2008, 337 from 2009). The director also noted 3 mediations this month and 42 for the year to date.
Commissioners discussed the disciplinary backlog and outlined next steps to move cases forward. Commissioners described planning immediate status conferences within 15 days of charges and creating a "master calendar" night to schedule hearings and settlement conferences so officers with pending matters could progress through adjudication or return to work. Commissioner Sparks said the effort aims to reduce time officers are out of service and to resolve cases more quickly.
During public comment, Jeff Gustafson, who said he has lived in the city 26 years, alleged that an officer threatened to "make sure I left the city in a body bag" and described repeated difficulties filing complaints at the Northern Station and with the OCC intake process. The chair advised him to use the OCC process; OCC staff present noted the agency—s availability and ongoing casework but the meeting did not include any investigative response beyond those statements.
Later in the meeting the commission voted to enter closed session to confer with legal counsel about pending litigation (Fonseca v. Fong et al.). On reconvening the commission moved for nondisclosure of closed‑session discussion (motion moved and seconded; the clerk recorded "with an objection still ordered") and then moved and seconded to adjourn at 8:56 p.m.
No formal disciplinary ruling or investigatory finding was announced during the public meeting; commissioners said they would return with procedural proposals and scheduling to accelerate case processing.
