Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Marshall elected commission president; vice-presidency decided 4–3; meeting adjourned in memory of two officers and a community member

San Francisco Police Commission · July 8, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Vice President Joe Marshall was nominated and elected commission president unanimously; the vice president vote was split 4–3; commissioners adjourned in memory of Officers Mike Walsh and Lawrence Lynch and community member Alan White.

The Police Commission conducted officer elections and several routine administrative items during its July 8 meeting.

Commissioner Lee nominated Vice President Joe Marshall for commission president; the nomination was seconded and carried. During roll call, multiple commissioners recorded affirmative votes and the chair stated, "Madam President, that carries unanimously." The commission then turned the gavel to President Marshall.

For vice president, the commission considered nominations for Commissioners Mizuko and De Jesus. The roll-call vote on the Mizuko nomination resulted in a 4–3 outcome; the clerk announced, "That carries 4 to 3." The transcript records commissioners’ statements in support of choosing leadership that reflects both board- and mayor-appointed perspectives, and commissioners offered brief remarks on the importance of balanced representation.

In routine administrative business, the commission assigned a disciplinary charge (case JWA c 09-128) to a commissioner for taking of evidence at a later date. At the meeting’s close commissioners moved and seconded adjournment in memory of Officer Michael Walsh, Officer Lawrence Lynch and community member Alan White; the motion passed and the meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m.

Why it matters: Leadership changes shape the commission’s agenda-setting and public-facing oversight priorities. The narrow vice-presidential vote highlights a modest division among commissioners on leadership roles.

What happened next: Commissioners scheduled follow-up administrative and oversight items and requested briefs on ongoing disciplinary backlogs and other committee work.