Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Patrol Specials topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission wrestles with patrol-specials approvals, training and an appeal process

San Francisco Police Commission · October 17, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A prolonged exchange examined slow processing of patrol-specials applications, inconsistent enforcement of rules, training shortfalls, and calls to revise rules and create an appeal process for applicants; commissioners tasked a small group to draft revised rules.

Commissioners devoted a major portion of the Oct. 17 meeting to the patrol-specials program after the chief reported eight active assistant-patrol-special applicants with various documentation or training holds. Deputy Chief Shin said some applications lacked diplomas or completed private-background packets and several past applicants were denied for reasons including force and theft issues.

Members of the patrol-specials community told commissioners they had not received annual training on several topics and said the department27s implementation of recent rules left some patrol-specials unable to qualify for range recertification because of consumer-affairs gun-and-guard card requirements. Commissioners pressed the chief on whether background investigators and department resources could be applied more promptly to clear application bottlenecks.

Several commissioners, particularly Commissioners Campos, Veronese and Mazuko, urged a clearer process: revise rules and regulations, create a due-process appeals route for applicants, and set firm timelines for background checks and training. The commission asked Commissioner Lee and a small group to circulate a draft revision for review and to consider scheduling a dedicated working session to finalize rules. The transcript records no final vote on rules changes during this meeting.