Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Francisco health department told to plan for sharp general‑fund cuts after $1.7 billion shock
Summary
City finance staff told the Health Commission May 19 that COVID‑19 has pushed the city's revenue outlook toward the high end of an earlier $1.1–$1.7 billion range, and asked departments to prepare roughly 10% general‑fund reductions in year one and larger cuts in year two; DPH staff said they will prioritize core public‑health and COVID response work.
Greg Wagner, the Department of Public Health's director of finance, told the Health Commission on May 19 that the city's interim budget process will be extended to allow departments time to revise spending plans after COVID‑19 damaged municipal revenues. "The mayor's office is going to submit a placeholder budget on June 1 and then an August 1 balanced budget," Wagner said, describing an additional two months to rebalance around a new financial reality.
Wagner said early March estimates put the two‑year hit to city revenues between $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion, and the May projection is at or slightly above the top of that range. He described guidance from the mayor requesting department proposals that reduce general‑fund support about 10% in the first year and larger reductions in the second year, noting that "each 5% is about $70 to $75 million," and that a 10% target for DPH's general‑fund portion is roughly $75 million.
The directive is procedural and relative to the department's general‑fund baseline, Wagner said. "It's not that we will have to do everything with 10% less," he added; department leadership and city officials expect to reallocate resources to sustain critical COVID‑19 response functions such as testing, contact tracing and surge preparedness even as non‑core programs are evaluated for cuts.
Commissioners pressed Wagner on what is "on the table" and how the department will continue pandemic work while meeting reduction targets. Commissioner Chow asked whether the June 1 submission is merely a placeholder; Wagner confirmed it is, and reiterated the August 1 date for a substantive mayoral budget. Commissioner Green asked whether long‑term contracts and community‑based organization funding might be flexible; Wagner said options will be evaluated but some tradeoffs will be difficult and not "pleasant."
Wagner said the city has started to estimate the pandemic cost footprint (an initial citywide projection of $373 million in pandemic‑related spending this fiscal year) and that federal sources such as the CARES Act and potential FEMA reimbursements "will help offset" some costs, though their duration and alignment with expenses remain uncertain. Commissioners asked for a tight process to keep the commission informed as reduction plans are prepared; Wagner and DPH staff said they will provide briefings and workshopping between now and departmental submission deadlines.
Next steps: Wagner indicated reduction plans will be due to the mayor's budget office by mid‑June and that the mayor's interim placeholder will be filed June 1; the commission will receive additional briefings as DPH develops its balancing plan.
