Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Health Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears federal American Health Care Act briefing; local funding implications noted
Summary
Policy staff briefed commissioners on the Congressional Budget Office score of the American Health Care Act: CBO projected 14 million would lose coverage in the first year and 24 million by 2026 if enacted; staff warned of possible increases in premiums and noted the president’s "skinny budget" proposed deep HHS cuts that require further detail to assess local impacts.
At the Health Commission meeting staff provided an update on the federal American Health Care Act (AHCA) and its potential implications for local health services. Citing the Congressional Budget Office score, the presenter said 14 million people would lose health insurance beginning in the next year and that figure could grow to 24 million by 2026 if the bill were enacted as introduced. The presenter also said the AHCA, as drafted, would save about $337 billion to the federal government over its budget window but would increase premiums in the short term and change subsidy mechanics by replacing income-based subsidies with age-based subsidies on the exchanges.
Staff summarized likely policy changes under discussion, including allowing states to opt for Medicaid block grants or per-capita caps, removing the expansion option for states that had not expanded Medicaid by a future date, and permitting states to implement work requirements for Medicaid beneficiaries with potential changes to the federal matching formula for states adopting such requirements.
The presenter noted House committee activity and uncertainty about Senate changes, and added that the president’s discretionary "skinny budget" proposed an approximately 18 percent reduction for the Department of Health and Human Services; staff said details were too sparse to project local impacts. Director Garcia said the department would brief the Board and continue to advocate at multiple levels while watching for state-level responses that could affect local programs such as Healthy San Francisco, which lacks a dedicated funding source.
No formal action was taken; staff asked commissioners to send questions in advance of the scheduled April vote on the Vision Zero resolution.
