Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Health Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health commission hears rapid overview of American Health Care Act and potential local impacts
Summary
Staff briefed commissioners on the House Republican "American Health Care Act," highlighting repeal of the individual and employer mandates, a 30% penalty for coverage lapses, rescission of Medicaid expansion and a move to per-capita Medicaid funding effective in 2020; commissioners requested ongoing updates and fiscal analysis.
Colleen Chawla, a policy director in the Department of Public Health, briefed the San Francisco Health Commission on the American Health Care Act, the House Republican bill introduced the day before, and outlined the provisions most relevant to the department and local programs.
Chawla said the bill would eliminate the individual and employer mandates and their penalties and impose a 30 percent surcharge on people who let coverage lapse, "a continuous health insurance coverage incentive for individuals. It's actually more of a disincentive," she said. She told commissioners the bill would rescind the Medicaid expansion and the enhanced federal match in 2020 and shift Medicaid financing from a federal matching percentage to a per-capita cap methodology.
The director's summary noted additional changes that would affect affordability and state flexibility: tax credits would be calculated by age rather than income on state exchanges, a proposed "state stability fund" could be used for high-risk pools or payments to insurers or providers, and cost-sharing subsidies for low-income individuals would be reworked. The briefing also said protections for pre-existing conditions and dependent coverage to age 26 would be retained.
Commissioners focused questions on timing and fiscal effects. Commissioner Pading asked whether reduced federal matching would amount to cost-shifting to counties; staff said state–county negotiations would determine how reductions are allocated and estimated that California could see a roughly $15,000,000,000 exposure related to the Medicaid expansion. Staff cautioned that the per-capita cap reduction amount was not yet known because federal rate-setting details were not available.
Commissioner Chung and others asked about related state activity, including a single-payer bill in Sacramento and how the state might respond. Staff said the department would continue to track changes closely and provide updates as the measures moved through committees.
The commission did not take action on the item; staff said many provisions would not be effective until 2020 and promised to return with further analysis and fiscal estimates as more details become available.
