Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health Commission approves using hospital property as short-term security for $160M Transbay bridge loan, 6-1
Summary
The commission approved a resolution to lease parts of the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital campus as security for certificates of participation to support Transbay Transit Center bridge financing not to exceed $160 million; the vote passed 6-1 after staff described limited operational risk to hospital functions.
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Health Commission voted to approve a resolution authorizing the leasing and subleasing of portions of the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital campus to serve as security for short-term certificates of participation (COPs) in an amount not to exceed $160 million to finance a portion of the Transbay Transit Center project.
John Updike, the citys director of real estate, told commissioners that pledging portions of the hospital campus for short-term bridge financing is precedent-based and was used for prior city financing; the pledge would be structured so trustee oversight would be limited to financial remedies rather than immediate repossession of operations. Nadia Sissay from the Office of Public Finance explained the risk: if the city defaulted on COP payments the trustee could sue for rent but the documents do not provide for immediate repossession; insurance and cure periods are included and the COP term is intended to be short (bank lease of three years; COP term no more than 15 years in the plan).
Commissioners asked about operational continuity, procedural timing (Board of Supervisors moving items before commission review) and litigation risks related to the Transbay project; staff said the principal risk here is general-fund repayment in a default, not direct intervening on hospital day-to-day operations.
A roll-call vote was taken; the resolution passed with six votes in favor and one no vote recorded after a commissioner changed an intended abstention to a 'no' because abstentions are not permitted under commission rules. No public comment was offered on the item at the hearing.
Ending: The commission recorded the vote as 6-1 and staff will follow up with the commission on any additional risk analysis or corrected paperwork relating to specific campus buildings included in the pledge.
