Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vision Zero topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Francisco health department asks commission to back Vision Zero and state authorization for automated speed enforcement pilot
Summary
Department of Public Health staff sought the commissions endorsement of a Vision Zero resolution asking the state to authorize an automated speed enforcement pilot limited to school zones, senior centers, construction zones and high-injury corridors; staff emphasized data showing pedestrians constitute two-thirds of traffic fatalities and urged support to press the citys state delegation.
Anna Velizic, a population health staffer at the San Francisco Department of Public Health, told the Health Commission the citys Vision Zero program aims to "reduce to eliminate traffic fatalities in San Francisco by 2024" and asked commissioners to endorse a resolution urging state authorization for a pilot automated speed enforcement (ASE) program.
Leilani Schwartz, describing evaluation work and trauma-registry linkage, said the city averages about 30 traffic fatalities per year and that roughly two-thirds of those fatalities are pedestrians. She cited a trauma-registry analysis that identified 515 severe traffic injuries over a single year and noted that half of the trauma deaths in that sample were pedestrians.
Katie Angotti of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency explained the ASE technology and proposed limits. She said the legislation the city seeks would restrict camera-based enforcement to school zones, senior centers, construction zones and corridors in the departments High Injury Network and that the proposed threshold would target vehicles traveling 10 miles per hour or more over the posted limit. Angotti summarized safety evidence from other U.S. jurisdictions and said privacy protections would limit images to license plates and prohibit other uses of the images.
Public comment supported the measure: Kathy DeLuca of WALK San Francisco praised DPHs data work and urged commissioners to support the resolution. Commissioners asked staff to strengthen the resolution language and to include clearer data citations and statistical significance statements where the document relies on specific figures.
DPH and SFMTA staff acknowledged state-level opposition from groups including the Teamsters and AAA and said they are working to address concerns (for example, by proposing that camera-issued ASE penalties be decriminalized and carry no points on a driving record). Staff also said revenue from any program would first cover program costs with any surplus dedicated to traffic safety projects.
The commission did not take a final vote on the resolution at this meeting; staff said the item would come back for a formal vote at the May 3 meeting with revised language addressing commissioners concerns.
