Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tobacco Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission hears update on local e-cigarette ordinance and implementation plans

San Francisco Department of Public Health Health Commission · April 15, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Community and Public Health Committee reported that a San Francisco ordinance (introduced by Supervisor Maher and Mayor Ed Lee) will treat e-cigarettes as tobacco where smoking is banned and require permits for sellers; staff said youth and community groups were involved and pledged a rollout report to the commission.

The Health Commission received an update on local regulation of electronic cigarettes following a Community and Public Health Committee briefing.

The committee reported that an ordinance introduced by Supervisor Maher and Mayor Ed Lee will treat e-cigarette use the same as tobacco use in places where smoking is already prohibited and will require permits for establishments that sell e-cigarettes. Committee members emphasized youth exposure and aggressive marketing by e-cigarette vendors as primary concerns. "San Francisco once again is leading the nation and pushing for a ban to e-cigarettes," the committee report said, noting known carcinogens and heavy metals in some e-cigarette products and a lack of long-term studies.

Commissioners asked staff to explain the Department of Public Health—s obligations now that the ordinance is signed and requested a report on rollout and public acceptance. Staff described enforcement implications: wherever smoking of conventional cigarettes is prohibited, e-cigarette use will similarly be disallowed, and retail sellers will need permits. Commissioners raised questions about housing-unit nonsmoking compliance fees and whether the ordinance affects existing private-housing enforcement; staff said they would follow up with specifics.

Staff also said the committee will bring participating community-based organizations and youth groups to a future presentation to explain the outreach and implementation process.

No regulatory changes beyond the ordinance signification were enacted at the meeting; commissioners requested a future update on implementation, housing applications, and any enforcement guidance.