Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the BlueShield Experience topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Aon: 2017 Blue Shield claims and capitation increases drive worse loss ratio; board adds $2.4M to stabilization deficit

Health Service Board · March 8, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Aon told the Health Service Board that Blue Shield plan expenses rose 5.1% in 2017, pushing the loss ratio to 99.9%. The board accepted a $2,396,000 adjustment to the Blue Shield stabilization deficit and will amortize one-third ($3.16M) into 2019 rates.

Aon presented a detailed review of Blue Shield of California’s lehi-funded flex plan experience for 2017 and recommended a stabilization adjustment the board accepted on March 8.

Key findings: Aon reported total incurred plan expense per subscriber increased 5.1 percent from 2016 to 2017, while premiums rose 3.7 percent, producing a loss-ratio increase to 99.9 percent from 98.6. The actuary identified two primary unfavorable drivers: an increase in large medical claims (2017 had $6,000,000 pooled out for claimants exceeding the $1,000,000 attachment point) and a 9.8 percent rise in capitation expenses. Pharmacy costs were roughly flat on a per-subscriber basis and administrative costs declined.

Stabilization recommendation: Because the actual incurred claims exceeded the forecast by approximately $4.2–4.3 million, Aon recommended adding $2,396,000 to the prior Blue Shield rate stabilization deficit carryforward. The board voted to accept the recommendation; under the Health Service Board policy the board will apply one-third of the resulting stabilization deficit (about $3,162,001) as a buy-up to 2019 premiums.

Board discussion: Commissioners pressed for greater transparency on how Blue Shield negotiates hospital/provider rates — information that materially affects future costs but is not fully shared with SFHSS. Commissioners also discussed longer-term choices between staying self-funded or moving to fully insured arrangements and asked staff to obtain comparative proposals.

Next steps: Staff will include the stabilization adjustment in the 2019 rating forecast and continue meetings with Blue Shield to refine trend and provider-contraction assumptions for next-year rate-setting.