Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Second Opinions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves Best Doctors second-opinion service over objections to cost and scope

Health Services Board, City and County of San Francisco · April 14, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Health Services Board voted 4–2 to engage Best Doctors for expert second opinions; commissioners debated the per-member cost, face-to-face expectations and potential budget implications before approving the engagement subject to final pricing.

San Francisco — The Health Services Board voted to contract with Best Doctors to offer members expert, document-based second opinions for complex or unclear diagnoses. The decision passed by roll call, 4–2.

Aon Hewitt and Best Doctors described a process in which members or the plan may initiate a review, records are collected and a subject-matter expert produces a detailed, evidence-based report; Best Doctors said it would also coordinate follow-up calls with members and treating physicians. Pricing was presented as a range: a basic per-employee fee estimated at $1.00–$1.50 per month, with optional outreach and extended-family add-ons.

Commissioners pressed for clarity about face-to-face expectations and demonstrated clinical value. Best Doctors’ representative said the program typically gathers records and completes expert review within seven to ten days (with fast-track options) and cited internal metrics: "We changed our diagnosis about 37% of the time and we changed the treatment about 75% of the time." Supporters said a centralized expert review can help members who cannot navigate appeals and can prevent unnecessary procedures; skeptics raised concerns about cost, overlap with existing second-opinion options in certain plans and adverse selection if participation were optional.

The board approved the engagement and asked staff to finalize the precise covered population and per-employee rate for inclusion in the HSS rate cards. The increase will be an administrative line on rate cards and therefore will affect premiums; staff noted premium-sharing rules and MOUs determine member vs employer shares.