Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Voluntary Benefits topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

HSS proposes vetted voluntary benefits for city employees; board discusses payroll and union hurdles

Health Services Board, City and County of San Francisco · August 13, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Director Catherine Dodd introduced a plan to offer voluntary ancillary benefits to city employees through a vetted aggregator; commissioners and public commenters raised concerns about payroll slots, union roles and whether retirees could be included.

The Health Service System presented an initial proposal to make voluntary benefits—such as long-term care, disability or pet insurance—available to city employees by contracting with an aggregator that would vet vendors. Director Catherine Dodd said the program would not carry a direct cost to HSS but would require administrative effort and payroll coordination with Emerge.

Dodd said the intent is not to endorse products but to provide a structured way for employees to access vetted vendors during open enrollment and other times. "We are trying to determine if people who show up are who they say they are and what they're representing so that we can indeed, if called upon, communicate that to the members of the system," she said.

Commissioners and public commenters warned of operational complexity: existing payroll deduction slots historically used by unions, long-standing vendor relationships managed by employee-benefit specialists and the need for significant dialogue with unions. Claire Zavonsky and other retirees described a decades-long pattern of on-site vendors and noted payroll-slot limits could be a barrier.

Director Dodd said the staff envisions an RFP to select an aggregator and to work with payroll and Emerge for deductions; she reiterated more study and discussion will be required before any formal action.

The board did not take a vote on the proposal; members asked staff to return with more detailed options and operational plans.