Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs preservation alternatives for 1101–1123 Sutter Street project
Summary
Planning staff and the project sponsor presented preservation alternatives for a proposed mixed‑use development at 1101–1123 Sutter St.; commissioners urged exploring options that retain or better integrate the unique 1123 Halsted mortuary facade and interior character while balancing housing yield and wind/massing impacts.
Planning staff and the project sponsor presented and discussed preservation alternatives Feb. 3 for a proposed mixed‑use project at 1101–1123 Sutter Street in the Tenderloin.
Patrick McNerney, president of Martin Building Company, described the sponsor’s proposal to retain and rehabilitate 1101 Sutter and to demolish the mortuary at 1123 Sutter for a new tower behind the retained facade. "It's proposed to have 201 apartments, 20% of on‑site affordable," McNerney said, and he noted planned amenities including bicycle and automobile parking and an on‑site childcare facility.
Justin Beck of the Planning Department reviewed alternatives that will be analyzed in the draft environmental impact report. Alongside the no‑project option, staff identified a full‑preservation alternative that would retain both buildings and construct roughly 115 units, and two partial‑preservation alternatives that would build roughly 151 or 181 units. Beck cautioned that some taller alternatives could introduce notable wind impacts and that the alternatives reflect tradeoffs between historic‑resource retention and unit yield.
Commissioners broadly praised the analysis and asked staff and the sponsor to explore retention approaches that better respect the Halsted mortuary’s street presence and interior features. Commissioner Pearlman urged the commission to consider a retained‑elements approach rather than a superficial facade treatment, saying retained facades can be a "band aid" unless more of the original volume is preserved. Several commissioners also urged the project team to incorporate character‑defining details of 1123 Sutter into the new design rather than replicating generic tower massing.
Commissioners raised practical concerns about ingress/egress and the challenges of stacking multiple program types on a constrained site. Commissioner Foley specifically encouraged the sponsor to pursue early‑childhood education space in the project. Staff said alternatives would be refined further in response to commissioner input and environmental analyses; the item was before the commission for review and comment, not for action.
