Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Park Ferris Wheel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves temporary observation wheel at Music Concourse after contested hearing
Summary
After extensive public comment for and against, the Historic Preservation Commission approved a one‑year Certificate of Appropriateness for a temporary observation wheel at Golden Gate Park’s Music Concourse, adding conditions to prohibit an automatic extension and requiring Rec & Park to conduct community outreach and mitigate lighting impacts. The vote was 4–1.
The Historic Preservation Commission approved a Certificate of Appropriateness on Jan. 15 for a proposed temporary observation wheel to be installed on the Music Concourse lawn in Golden Gate Park as part of the park’s 150th anniversary celebration.
Michelle Taylor of the Planning Department and Stacy Bradley of the Recreation and Parks Department presented the proposal: the wheel would measure about 130 feet in diameter (roughly 150 feet high), be supported by below‑grade piles, operate for approximately 10 months beginning April 4, 2020, and be removed with the site restored by March 2021. Staff reported receiving multiple letters both in opposition and support and recommended approval with conditions based on Article 10 and Secretary of the Interior standards.
Public comment was split. Supporters, including the San Francisco Parks Alliance and the San Francisco Lawn Bowling Club, said the wheel would be an anchor attraction for the year‑long celebration and draw more visitors to the park. Opponents — including San Francisco Heritage, Sierra Club, Golden Gate Audubon and neighborhood advocates — urged denial or further environmental review, raising concerns about the wheel’s scale, nighttime lighting effects on wildlife, precedent for continued use, and whether the project is compatible with John McLaren’s historic vision for the park.
Planning staff described the environmental review as a categorical exemption, citing comparable lighting and biological analyses in the record (for example, the Beach Chalet and Bay Bridge lighting studies) and attached standard construction measures to the exemption. The city attorney’s office noted that the categorical exemption could be appealed to the Board of Supervisors (appeal period had not yet lapsed at the time of the hearing).
After deliberation, the commission approved the COA with amended conditions that removed language allowing an automatic extension and directed Recreation and Parks to conduct community outreach on lighting and implement mitigation measures; the motion passed 4–1 with Commissioner Pearlman voting against. The commission recorded its finding that the proposal, as conditioned, met Article 10 and Secretary of the Interior standards. The decision may still be subject to a CEQA appeal to the Board of Supervisors during the administrative appeal period.
