Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 940 Battery Museo topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves Museo Italo Americano plan at 940 Battery Street with conditions after neighbors raise preservation concerns

San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission · August 1, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Historic Preservation Commission approved a certificate of appropriateness for conversion of 940 Battery Street to the Museo Italo Americano, imposing conditions including staff review of shop drawings; the decision followed public objections from adjacent property owners about facade and interior alterations.

The San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission on Aug. 1 unanimously approved a certificate of appropriateness for renovation of 940 Battery Street to house the Museo Italo Americano, but conditioned approval on staff review of final details and shop drawings.

Rebecca Salgado, planning staff, recommended approval with conditions after describing the project’s scope: new larger ground-floor entrance with a projecting bronze canopy, rehabilitation of historic steel windows, replacement of nonhistoric second-floor windows, interior alterations to retain heavy timber columns on the first floor, and a modest rooftop addition set back from Battery Street (staff presentation, SEG 1331–1390). Staff concluded the work would conform with Article 10 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.

Project representatives (Larry Badner, Mark Schiavenza and Steve Oliver) described the Museo’s 40-year history, its mission, and a plan to create gallery space and income-producing floors to support long-term operations. Sponsor presentations emphasized the building was long vacant and that the proposal would reactivate and enliven that section of the waterfront.

Public commenters included nearby property owners who urged more modest facade changes and restoration of existing dock openings and the building’s interior wooden columns. Michael Busk, trustee of 900 Battery Street, said the proposed enlarged ground-floor opening would “more than double the width” of the existing dock door and would be “out of proportion” with the longer 183-foot façade, arguing the cumulative effect would harm the district’s warehouse character. Several speakers requested a continuance so neighbors and sponsor could discuss alternate designs; others urged preservation of wooden columns in the basement and second floor.

Commission discussion balanced reuse benefits against preservation concerns. Some commissioners emphasized the public benefits of activating a long-vacant building and the museum’s role in revitalizing the block; others urged careful conditions to protect remaining historic fabric. The commission’s approval includes conditions for staff to review window shop drawings and finish details and for other standard conditions of approval. The motion passed unanimously, 6–0.

Next steps include staff review of the identified shop drawings and details, and any remaining conditions will be implemented through the standard permit and plan-review process.