Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

HPC concurs that Section 106 MOA is appropriate for Pump Station No. 2, recommends director sign MOA

San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission · January 20, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed the Section 106 finding for Pump Station No. 2 (Fort Mason) and agreed to the proposed memorandum of agreement with mitigation measures; they recommended the Planning Director sign the MOA and the commission voted to advise the director accordingly.

The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a Section 106 finding and a draft Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for seismic upgrades to Pump Station Number 2 at Fort Mason and concluded that the mitigation measures in the draft MOA were appropriate. Commission staff had asked the HPC to review the draft MOA and to advise whether the Planning Director should engage as a signatory.

Justin Garvin (Planning Department) summarized the project scope and staff’s Section 106 conclusions: the undertaking will have an adverse effect on Pump Station No.…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans