Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Commissioner raises concerns about PDR-to-office conversions and staff due diligence
Summary
Commissioner Perlman told the Historic Preservation Commission an article alleging project sponsors misrepresented building uses warrants stronger staff verification of PDR (production, distribution, repair) conversions; staff agreed to bring code language and to coordinate a Planning Commission briefing.
Commissioner Perlman told the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission on June 4 that a recent article in 48 Hills Online suggested sponsors had misrepresented existing uses when seeking conversion of PDR (production, distribution, repair) space to office, and she urged stronger staff verification.
"It felt like we had been significantly lied to by the project sponsor," Perlman said, citing 660 Third Street and other recent conversions. She said at least three projects (665 Third Street, 660 Third Street and 2 Henry…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
