Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Veterans Building topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves option B for Veterans Building skylights; veterans to review mock-up

San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission · January 15, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After technical presentations and public input, the commission approved replacing the Veterans Building's upper skylights with continuous metal roof panels (option B), a reversible solution recommended by several commissioners and the project team; the motion included inviting a veterans representative to review the mock-up.

The Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to approve "Option B" for the upper skylights on the Veterans Building roof: replace the existing, deteriorated skylights with a continuous sheet-metal roof panel that can be reversed in the future.

Planning staff (Rich Sucre) outlined three options: (A) new skylights with a curb detail projecting roughly a half-inch, (B) a continuous sheet-metal roof panel matching other rehabilitated roofing, and (C) a panel that would include a commemorative seam denoting the former skylight locations. Staff recommended option C for visual continuity and reversibility but noted waterproofing challenges for a truly flush skylight in the building's very low slope and shallow-profile conditions.

Tara Lamont, the city's project manager for the Veterans Building seismic upgrade, explained engineering and waterproofing constraints uncovered in the shop-drawing stage and said that the San Francisco Opera will invest $18,000,000 in spaces below the skylights, creating specific programmatic and lighting needs. Preservation architect Nancy Goldenberg and the project team argued that watertight skylights on the upper roof would require a curb and a more prominent profile that would not match the building's historic, flush character; they also noted the change would be reversible.

Public commenters included Jerome Shapiro (San Francisco Post/American Legion) and Paul Cox, vice chair of the War Memorial Commission American Legion Committee, who urged a practical, durable solution and expressed support for option B. Cox said the flush skylight detail has been nearly impossible to replicate with certainty and called option B "a way to eliminate a series of problems," including longstanding leakage and heat gain.

During deliberations commissioners balanced authenticity, durability and reversibility; several favored option B as the cleanest, most practical approach that preserves the building's overall appearance and reduces future maintenance risk. A motion to approve option B was amended to invite a member of the veterans team to review the required mock-up; that amended motion passed 7-0.

Next steps: The project sponsor will prepare a mock-up of the chosen detail for preservation staff review; staff will notify the veterans team and the American Legion representatives as requested. The mock-up and shop drawings will be used to finalize permit conditions and building-permit submittals.