Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fund Transfer topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

LAFCO approves transfer of $126,000 to San Francisco Board of Supervisors

LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) · July 21, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During the special meeting commissioners approved, without objection, transferring $126,000 from LAFCO's available fund back to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors; commissioners discussed carryforward balances, PUC-dedicated CCA funds, and the OLA’s $160,000 need.

At a special LAFCO meeting commissioners moved and approved a transfer of $126,000 from LAFCO’s available funds to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

An unnamed commissioner moved to transfer $126,000 from the commission’s current fund of about $800,000; Chair Ross Mercurini seconded the motion. The clerk called for public comment and none was offered. The motion was approved "without objection." No formal roll-call vote was requested.

Earlier in the discussion Angela Calvillo (Clerk of the Board) said the controller showed the Office of the Legislative Analyst needs about $160,000, that LAFCO currently had about $800,000 in carryforward and that the PUC had budgeted $700,000 for CCA this fiscal year; speakers also discussed that another $700,000 could be available in the next fiscal year, creating a theoretical $1.4 million available for CCA work over the coming year if all amounts were available and appropriate for LAFCO to draw on.

Commissioners noted that the $700,000 PUC allocation was intended strictly for CCA work and should remain dedicated to oversight of the program. During debate different figures were mentioned (including a preliminary suggestion of $159,000) before the motion for $126,000 was made and approved. The meeting record shows the motion was made and seconded and approved without objection; the commission provided no further public-record details about the precise allocation or timing for the transfer during the special session.

The meeting returned to other business and adjourned after the transfer motion was approved.