Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Venue Relief topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs $48 million venue relief package and directs staff to draft targeted letter
Summary
The Entertainment Commission reviewed an industry‑draft relief package seeking up to $48 million for independent venues, debated which items the city can enact locally vs. what requires state action, and directed staff to combine the industry asks with Economic Recovery Task Force recommendations for a draft to return on Dec. 15.
San Francisco’s Entertainment Commission discussed on Dec. 1 a three‑page relief proposal from the San Francisco Venue Coalition and the Independent Venue Alliance that would provide emergency financial relief to independent venues hit by the pandemic.
President Ben Blyman read the document’s 10 asks, which include emergency relief for rent and payroll, utility and insurance assistance, direct grants or forgivable loans equal to 15–20% of 2019 gross revenue (capped at $750,000 per venue), an estimated total package of $48,000,000, a venue‑specific legacy business program, extended commercial eviction abatement while venues cannot operate at full capacity, fee waivers, and temporary zoning protections for venue spaces.
Blyman and multiple commissioners framed the package as urgent for venues “forced outside” by pandemic restrictions and said the commission should advocate for targeted aid. Commissioners also debated strategy: some urged endorsing the full industry list, while others recommended extracting and prioritizing the items that the city can implement without state or federal action. Commissioner Wang noted legal limits on some requests (for example, certain eviction or tax changes require state action) and urged the commission to be precise about what it asks the mayor and Board of Supervisors to pursue.
Staff said the commission can pursue several paths: (1) vote to send a letter of support for the full package to the mayor and Board of Supervisors (with the chair signing), (2) ask staff to draft a narrower letter that combines the industry asks with the Economic Recovery Task Force recommendations and return on Dec. 15 for commission review and a possible vote, or (3) draft a resolution. Commissioners directed staff to pursue the second option: to group asks by target (local/state/federal), identify existing programs that may cover some needs, and return a draft for Dec. 15.
Public commenters — including venue operators and community members — urged immediate financial relief and emphasized venues’ cultural and economic value. Several asked that the commission champion relief specifically for nightlife and small music venues, arguing that venues closed early in the pandemic and will likely be among the last to reopen.
Commissioners also reiterated concern about a separate operational burden: a $375 Fire Department fee to permit outdoor heat lamps. President Blyman called the fee “onerous” for businesses compelled to operate outdoors and asked staff to explore advocacy or fee relief with the Fire Department.
No final vote on the relief package occurred; staff will return a draft letter that targets feasible local actions and identifies items requiring higher‑level action for Dec. 15.
