Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sound Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Entertainment Commission approves AT&T Park concert permits with sound‑mitigation conditions
Summary
The San Francisco Entertainment Commission unanimously approved two amplified‑sound permits for concerts at AT&T Park (Sept. 5 and Sept. 25) after commissioners added conditions requiring sound monitoring, on‑site inspectors for sound checks and events and a dedicated neighbor hotline administered by the promoter in addition to 311 logging.
Get email alerts on the Sound Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Entertainment Commission on July 21 voted unanimously to approve two amplified‑sound permits for concerts at AT&T Park — scheduled Sept. 5 and Sept. 25 — with conditions intended to limit off‑site noise and improve complaint tracking.
Commissioners took the action after staff summarized outreach with the Port of San Francisco, the Giants and concert producers and after presentations from Sarah Hunt, vice president of Giants Enterprises, and Mary Condie of producer Another Planet Entertainment. Hunt said the Giants had engaged acoustical consultant Salter & Associates to monitor sound and would share data gathered during sound checks. She proposed that, in addition to the city’s 311 complaint system, the promoter operate a dedicated phone line for neighbor complaints to allow faster, more direct response.
The commission’s approved conditions require: on‑site acoustical monitoring during sound checks and performances; at least two additional staff or contractors positioned to monitor sound outside the venue; on‑site availability of commission sound inspectors for the sound check and event (explicitly requested for the louder Sept. 25 date); and the promoter’s commitment to real‑time adjustments if monitoring or complaint data indicate problems. The commission also accepted the Giants’ request to provide an isolated neighbor line rather than rely solely on 311, while staff emphasized that complaint logs should ultimately be trackable through the city’s 311 system for official records.
The decision followed sustained questioning from commissioners about operational details: where speakers and delay towers would be located, how much real‑time control the venue would have once the artist’s production configures the system, whether monitoring would include residential‑area decibel checks, and how the city’s enforcement tools would be applied if the permit conditions were violated. Condie said producers typically use a mix of the artist’s standard touring configuration and venue‑specific adjustments; for these shows she said producers plan to employ four delay towers and to tune speaker array width and height to reduce the need for higher volumes.
Staff and several commissioners raised enforcement and accountability concerns. The executive director noted that current administrative code fines for loudspeaker violations are modest (a $100 citation per violation under current code) and that staff is preparing a longer effort to revise dated police‑code sections and seek legislative sponsorship for stronger, clearer enforcement tools. Commissioners asked staff to clarify how 311 would log complaints and how a promoter‑run hotline would be reconciled with city records; staff said they were meeting with 311 to standardize scripts and processes for the concert nights.
The permits were approved by voice vote, with every commissioner present answering in the affirmative. Commissioners said they wanted strong monitoring during the sound checks and early‑night operations, and that they expected the promoter and Giants to be responsive and to provide public data (sound readings) where needed.
Votes at a glance: the commission voted to approve both AT&T Park amplified‑sound permits with the conditions described above. The vote was unanimous.
What happens next: the Giants and producers will provide the commission and staff with show configurations, acoustical plans and a complaint‑response protocol ahead of the concerts so inspectors and the acoustical consultant can coordinate monitoring and response.
