Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permit Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Entertainment Commission denies Kania Cuban Parlor permit after neighbors describe repeated unpermitted events and safety problems
Summary
After extensive neighbor testimony and police reports of unpermitted events and street disturbances, the San Francisco Entertainment Commission voted 6–1 to deny a replacement entertainment permit for Kania Cuban Parlor at 500 Florida Street, citing inadequate outreach, unresolved violations and insufficient safeguards to prevent noise and public-safety impacts.
The San Francisco Entertainment Commission voted 6–1 on April 1 to deny a replacement entertainment permit for Kania Cuban Parlor at 500 Florida Street after hearing extensive public comment alleging repeated unpermitted events, noise and safety incidents.
Commissioners and police described a record of events at the site that continued after staff told the operator not to hold entertainment. Mission Station permit staff and police presented accounts that events had taken place without an issued place-of-entertainment permit and recommended careful scrutiny. Multiple neighbors said the venue’s Sunday events and other gatherings produced loud crowds, fights, property damage and late-night disturbances.
Attorney Mark Rennie and managing partner Gary Mitchell told the commission they intended to be responsive and had begun outreach and improvements, but several commissioners said the operator’s answers showed inadequate preparation. A Mission Station permit officer referenced reports of events held since June and said the operator had been advised that entertainment could not occur until a permit was issued. Neighbors and staff also cited a lease clause that could lead to civil remedies, saying the landlord had warned the tenants that failing to abide by closing and use restrictions could result in eviction.
Residents who live near the site described repeated disruptions: “People peeing, drunks all over the neighborhood,” one neighbor said, and others recounted broken windows, a gun found outside a window, and fights outside the location. Police and permit staff said they had worked with the operator but remained concerned about the applicant’s lack of detailed security planning, prior unpermitted events, and incomplete outreach.
Commissioner discussion focused on whether the applicant had done enough to show it could prevent noise and protect public safety. One commissioner moved to deny the permit, citing incomplete posting and outreach and unresolved permit or citation issues; another seconded. When the roll call vote was taken, the motion to deny carried 6–1.
By denying the replacement permit, the commission barred the applicant from reapplying for the same permit for a year unless the decision is appealed to the Board of Appeals; the vote does not prevent the business from operating as a restaurant and bar under other non-entertainment licenses. The Commission said it would enforce conditions and pursue revocation if future violations occur.
The operator may appeal the decision or reapply at a later date with more complete outreach, a detailed security plan and demonstrated compliance with police and code requirements.
