Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Western Soma Entertainment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Entertainment commission forms subcommittee to reexamine Western SoMa plan
Summary
The San Francisco Entertainment Commission voted to form a three‑member subcommittee to hold public outreach on how entertainment fits into the Western SoMa community plan, after months of contested public comment and concerns about the plan’s effects on both venues and residents.
The San Francisco Entertainment Commission on Jan. 21 formed a three‑member subcommittee to further study how entertainment uses should be addressed in the Western SoMa community plan.
Vice President Joseph opened the meeting by stressing the commission’s role as an advisory body and saying the commission respected the Western SoMa planning process while acknowledging outstanding concerns. Commissioner Hyde described prolonged outreach and said she sought more open discussion of entertainment’s role after venues, businesses and neighbors raised issues during the plan’s drafting and the pending environmental review (EIR).
During the public comment period, longtime neighborhood activists and representatives of the Western SoMa Citizens Planning Task Force urged the commission not to overturn the task force’s work, citing the task force’s roughly 66 meetings and documents that include sound‑attenuation measures, entry orientation and other protections for entertainment. Industry advocates, including the California Music and Culture Association, said entertainment venues are vital to the city’s cultural and economic fabric and recommended permitting and building‑code approaches (for example, insulation and double‑paned windows) to protect both residents and businesses.
Commissioner Joseph appointed Commissioners Tan, Hyde and himself to a subcommittee that will hold at least three public meetings and produce an agenda for outreach and follow‑up. The commission emphasized that any formal change to the community plan would be advisory to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors and that changes requiring environmental review could delay adoption of the plan.
The subcommittee will focus on outreach to residents, neighbors and venue owners, clarify which provisions in the Western SoMa plan already address sound and use conflicts, and identify discrete options the full commission could include in recommendations to the planning bodies. The commission did not adopt any land‑use changes at this meeting; its action was limited to forming the subcommittee and committing to additional public vetting.
Next steps: the subcommittee will schedule at least three public meetings and circulate agendas to interested parties, as promised during the meeting.
