Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Id Scanners Surveillance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vendors demonstrate ID scanners and surveillance systems; commissioners and public flag privacy risks
Summary
Vendors showed mobile and kiosk ID-scanning products and central, cross-venue databases; presenters emphasized benefits for investigations and venue safety while commissioners and public raised privacy concerns and urged careful data-access rules and real-world references.
Vendors at the Nov. 9 meeting demonstrated ID-scanning and video-surveillance products for entertainment venues and fielded detailed questions about cost, data retention and law-enforcement access.
Tim Iker, a Castro bar owner and developer, described a consumer-electronics–based scanner and an accompanying cloud service he calls Barkeep. He said a magnetic-stripe reader could be sold for roughly $750 and that adding 2D-barcode reading to cover IDs from more states adds about $200. Iker described features intended to prevent identity-swapping and repeated ID use and said his early tests did not save scan data on the phone; if stored for investigations the data would be encrypted and require authenticated access. He said he would prefer police requests to require a subpoena rather than an informal "upon request" standard.
Tarek Bonner presented Servall, a kiosk-based system with a central database that captures ID images and can propagate bans or incident reports across venues in real time. He said initial equipment costs are roughly $2,000–$3,000 with additional monthly software fees or lease options.
Public commenters and commissioners voiced sharply divergent views. Mark Grenny warned of constitutional privacy protections and the danger of low-wage staff entering erroneous or vindictive notes into an industry-wide database: "You've got a $22 an hour person who hates somebody that took their girlfriend away. So he types into that little computer system that this guy is crazy... and that goes out on a national database? Come on." Venue representatives said camera evidence can be key to prosecutions and urged practical tools to improve public safety.
Commissioners asked vendors for references and for live installations to be reviewed before considering policy changes. Staff and commissioners emphasized training for security personnel so that guards do not rely solely on a green/red scan result and underscored the need to define who may access stored data and under what legal standard.
Next steps: commissioners requested vendor references showing systems in operation, additional cost details, and a legal review of any proposed data-access language before considering permit-condition changes that would mandate ID scanning.
