Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Permitting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Entertainment commission and SFPD press for tighter permits, promoter tracking after weekend violence

San Francisco Entertainment Commission · August 10, 2010
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After two weekend incidents — including a fatal shooting near Union Square and a large fight that spilled into Broadway — the San Francisco Entertainment Commission and SFPD highlighted gaps in permitting and promoter oversight and urged legislative fixes to let the commission cite unpermitted locations.

Deputy Director, delivering the commission’s staff report, told commissioners that two violent incidents over the weekend had been reported in the media: a shooting near Union Square that resulted in the death of a German tourist and a separate late-night fight near Folsom and Sixth streets that left people injured. "Unfortunately, over the past weekend, there were 2 incidents of violences that were reported in the media as nightclub related," the Deputy Director said.

Inspector Dave Fowles of the San Francisco Police Department said the Mason Street incident on Aug. 8 consumed substantial resources. "It looks like it's about 70 or so officers, including our command staff, that also responded," Fowles said, adding the initial response and crime-scene work absorbed "in excess of 150 police hours." He said one of the central problems was events taking place at locations that had not been shared with regulators and that, on a broad review, the unpermitted youth event should have met the Entertainment Commission’s permit criteria.

Commissioners and staff described the regulatory gap the incident exposed. A commissioner asked whether the youth event had the special permit required under police code; the Deputy Director replied it did not and staff had no prior interaction or public assembly permit information for that location. The Deputy Director noted the office is limited by the scope of its existing citation authority: while a new administrative citation form and fine schedule cleared city review, "this citation authority is very specific to allow us to cite only venues that have permits from us," staff said, meaning unpermitted locations cannot be cited under the current form.

SFPD recommended policy options the commission could pursue. Fowles urged the city to consider promoter registration and stronger tracking of one-time event promoters and the spaces they rent so regulators and police can rapidly identify potentially high-risk events without burdening legitimate nonprofit or regularly operated venues. "What we're gonna continue to encourage you guys... is tracking the people that employ promoters, and secondly, the promoters themselves," he said, noting the need to balance that oversight with impacts on bona fide nonprofits.

Commissioners said they would pursue several immediate steps: sit-downs between staff and the venues involved (Club Sutra, The Parlor and others were specifically mentioned), closer information-sharing with station permit officers, and legislative work with the City Attorney and SFPD to expand citation authority so enforcement can address unpermitted events. The Deputy Director said staff will work with the City Attorney and police to propose legislative remedies and return with recommendations.

The meeting closed the discussion by asking staff to coordinate follow-up sessions with SFPD and affected venues and to report back with any proposed ordinance language or procedural changes to strengthen notification and oversight.