Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Entertainment Commission imposes new permit conditions on Jelly’s after July 11 homicide, stops short of revocation
Summary
After a July 11 homicide nearby, the Entertainment Commission reviewed Jelly’s Pier 50 permit, accepted staff and Bayview Station recommendations to impose revised security and good‑neighbor conditions (excluding an ID‑scanner mandate for now) and approved the package by roll call.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Entertainment Commission on Tuesday adopted a package of revised permit conditions for Jelly’s, the long‑running dance and music venue at Pier 50, following a July 11 homicide that occurred outside the club.
Acting director Jocelyn Kane told commissioners staff had issued a prospective 7‑day suspension in the days after the incident and later pursued a full permit review. Kane said police and health‑department reports indicated sufficient public‑safety concern to justify the temporary suspension and a formal remediation plan. Joyce Kane said the July action did not affect food and beverage services and that new permit conditions were intended to reduce the risk of future violence.
Counsel Whitney Lay, representing Jelly’s, disputed widely publicized accounts that the fatal attack began inside the club. “That is not true,” Lay told the commission, saying homicide investigators and the venue’s own review showed the shooting occurred outside and not as the result of an altercation that started inside Jelly’s. Lay asked the commission to put on the record that the commission itself was not seeking to close the business and expressed concern that Port of San Francisco statements and the press had conflated separate actions.
Officer Tim Dalton, Bayview Station’s permit officer, told the commission his office had documented three shootings outside or near Jelly’s in an 18‑month window, including two fatal or injurious incidents and one where a suspect was arrested. He said one condition he proposed was a strict no‑loitering requirement outside the venue and that the station had submitted a list of additional recommended conditions to staff.
The public record at the hearing was dominated by supporters of Jelly’s. Dozens of patrons, neighborhood residents and musicians described the venue as a cultural institution for salsa and Latin music, giving first‑hand accounts of long years of safe attendance and community programming.
Commission discussion focused on the staff package and the police recommendations. Commissioners said they favored broad adoption of staff and Bayview conditions but, citing cost and technical limits, agreed to exclude a mandatory ID‑scanner requirement from the motion while leaving it open for later reconsideration if the venue’s lease continued.
Commissioner Allen moved to accept staff conditions, the good‑neighbor policy and Bayview Station’s recommendations except for the scanner; the motion was seconded and accepted as amended. Roll call recorded aye votes from Commissioners Nolan, Micco, Perez, Allen and President Joseph. The commission directed staff to formalize the revised security plan, to require notification of Bayview Station of the venue’s calendar, and to monitor compliance; no revocation or eviction was ordered by the commission.
Next steps include formalizing the revised permit conditions in writing and continued monitoring by Entertainment Commission staff and SFPD; the Port of San Francisco’s separate eviction action remains a distinct administrative proceeding.
