Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission adopts updated record retention policy after amending contract/grant retention periods

San Francisco Commission on the Environment · December 6, 2022
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission amended and approved the Department of the Environment’s record retention policy, extending contract/grant retention language to ‘contract life plus seven years’ and adopting digital‑first guidance for email and electronic records.

The Commission on the Environment voted Dec. 6 to adopt an updated record retention policy and schedule for the Department of the Environment after agreeing to an amendment requested by the Office of the Controller.

Deirdre Tannenberg, public affairs assistant coordinator, presented the updated policy, which aligns the department with the Administrative Code (chapter 8) and adds guidance on email records, federal awards and a digital‑first approach to records storage. Staff said email systems (e.g., Outlook) alone do not satisfy retention obligations and highlighted limits on storing records on external drives.

During discussion staff noted specific required edits from the controller’s office: change multiple schedule line items that previously read “2 years” to “contract life plus 7 years retention or the term required by the funding source” for contract, agreement, MOU and grant records. The commission moved an amendment to implement that language; commissioners then voted to adopt the amended policy by roll call.

Public comment raised formatting and naming concerns (noting the City Charter reference to “Department of the Environment”) and requested clearer sections for finance and program records. Staff said the policy would be submitted for the controller’s and City Attorney’s signatures as required.

Next steps: staff will collect required signatures from Controller, City Attorney and Retirement Board and finalize the schedule; commissioners instructed staff to implement the policy upon adoption.