Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force outlines a climate-minded economic recovery, highlighting disproportionate job losses and priorities for low-income workers
Summary
City staff, economists and business leaders told the Commission on the Environment that San Francisco lost roughly 175,000 jobs early in the pandemic and has recovered about 62,000, and urged recovery plans that protect low-wage workers, revive transit and align private-sector commitments with climate goals.
San Francisco's Economic Recovery Task Force briefed the Commission on the Environment on the scale of the city's pandemic recession and a set of priorities to guide recovery planning.
Ted Egan, chief economist in the city controller's office, said San Francisco lost "about a 175,000 jobs between March and April of this year" and had regained roughly 62,000 jobs by August. He noted that the unemployment rate jumped from about 3% to above 12% and that losses have fallen hardest on low-wage sectors such as accommodation, food service, arts and neighborhood personal services. "So we're roughly a third of the way back," Egan said.
The scale and distribution of job losses drove the task force's focus, presenters said. Heather Green, director of capital planning and deputy resilience officer, described the task force as a 100-plus member body convened by the mayor and board leadership to "sustain and revive local business and employment, mitigate hardship for those most vulnerable, and build a resilient and equitable future." Staff said the task force solicited more than 1,000 survey responses and organized small work groups to produce concrete recommendations.
Business leaders offered private-sector commitments to align recovery with climate goals. Maura McKnight, executive director of the Business Council on Climate Change, described the Climate Smart Recovery Initiative, which includes member forums, employee engagement campaigns and an offer to convene companies with city agencies on specific projects. McKnight highlighted corporate investments and "moonshot" targets from members as examples of private resources that could support a green recovery.
Commissioners pressed presenters on data gaps and practical next steps. Commissioner Sullivan asked whether the city has reliable evidence of residents leaving the city; Egan said much of the migration data is still anecdotal and that national- and local-level sources (e.g., IRS flows, the decennial census) will take months or years to clarify patterns. Egan suggested using higher-frequency metrics such as BART ridership counts as interim indicators of downtown and transit recovery.
Why this matters: presenters framed recovery choices as both an equity and climate test—low-income workers bore the brunt of layoffs, while transit ridership and tourism losses threaten long-term revenue and neighborhood businesses. The task force staff said a final report was being circulated for comment and that leadership planned to share recommendations on Oct. 8; commissioners and staff discussed how the department and the commission could help translate the task force's recommendations into durable legislation and capital priorities.
The commission opened and closed a public comment period during the item. Susan Karasoff of the California Native Plant Society urged the task force to include biodiversity and native-plant strategies in recovery planning, calling green spaces essential to public health during the pandemic.
Next steps: staff said the task force report will be finalized and shared with mayoral and board leadership and that additional planning processes (housing element, capital planning, Climate Action updates) will be the venues in which many specific recommendations are implemented.
