Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Ethics Commission approves $53,916 settlement for Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy

September 27, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Ethics Commission approves $53,916 settlement for Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy
The San Francisco Ethics Commission voted to adopt a proposed stipulation finding that Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy (a 501(c)(4) operating as a general purpose committee) failed to report just over $100,000 in non‑monetary contributions involving consultant services provided to a recall committee and approved a staff‑recommended penalty of $53,916.

Investigator Zach D'Amico told the commission that Rift City Strategies was paid by Neighbors Advocacy to provide services that primarily benefitted the recall committee that sought to remove Chesa Boudin in late 2021 and early 2022; because more than 10 percent of Rift City’s compensated time was attributable to the recall committee, the payments should have been reported as non‑monetary contributions to the committee. "Neighbors Advocacy failed to report just over 100,000 in these non monetary contributions," D'Amico said, noting three late contributions within 90 days of the June election.

Commissioners praised staff for the investigation and asked procedural questions about detection and notification practices. Public comment included a three‑minute statement from Ellen Lijao who criticized the commission's authority and alleged political targeting; her remarks did not alter the staff presentation. Commissioner Salahi was recused from this matter; a roll‑call vote recorded four ayes and the motion passed.

The stipulated penalty in the presentation is $53,916, described in staff materials as roughly half of the unreported contribution amount; staff noted the disclosure violations masked who was spending to influence the election and how funds were used. The commission recorded the vote to adopt the staff recommendation and closed the matter.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal