Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement Permit Expediter topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners review permit-expediter settlement and announce two closed-session probable-cause votes
Summary
Staff summarized a city-attorney settlement in a permit-expediter case in which Walter Wong admitted 12 violations of the permanent consultant reporting laws and was assessed maximum penalties; the commission also met in closed session and took two probable-cause-related actions (one not to ratify a staff no-probable-cause recommendation, 4-1; one to ratify no probable cause, 5-0).
Senior investigator Jeff Zingwalt briefed commissioners on the city attorney's settlement with permit expediter Walter Wong and described the permanent consultant reporting requirements and penalties. Zingwalt said Wong admitted to 12 violations for undisclosed contacts and campaign contributions and was assessed maximum administrative penalties and late fees.
Zingwalt summarized the permit consultant rules: permanent consultants who contact Building Inspection, Planning or Public Works on behalf of large ($1M+) construction projects must file monthly disclosure reports identifying clients, contact employees, compensation and contributions. Penalties include administrative fines up to $5,000 per violation, a treble penalty for unreported campaign contributions and $50 per day late fees for required filings.
Commissioners asked whether the settlement had been calendared; staff said the matter was assigned to the Board of Supervisors' Government Audit and Oversight Committee and not yet heard. Several commissioners urged more outreach to permit consultants and improved department-to-department communication so the Ethics Commission can better detect unreported activity.
Closed-session actions: The commission then moved into closed session on anticipated litigation and later announced two actions. On one whistleblower-related matter the commission voted not to ratify staff—recommendation of no probable cause (vote: 4 in favor of not ratifying, 1 opposed — Commissioners Busch, Chu, Lee and Ambrose voted to not ratify; Commissioner Bell opposed). On a second matter the commission ratified the staff recommendation of no probable cause (vote: 5-0). The chair announced both outcomes on return to open session.
Public reaction: Public callers expressed frustration with perceived corruption and urged stronger enforcement; one public commenter identified herself as a whistleblower and thanked staff for clearer whistleblower reporting in the annual report draft.
