Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Independent Expenditure Limits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission deadlocks on reprioritizing work to pursue limits on independent-expenditure contributions
Summary
A motion to substitute work on limits for contributions to independent-expenditure committees into the commission's top policy priorities produced a 2' 2 tie, falling short of the three votes required to change the quarterly prioritization plan; commissioners debated constitutionality and scheduling before the vote.
A proposal to shift the Ethics Commission's near-term policy focus to drafting an ordinance that would limit contributions to independent-expenditure committees failed to advance after commissioners deadlocked.
Commissioner Rennie moved to substitute the independent-expenditure (IE) contribution limits proposal for one of the staff's two recommended priorities (the revision of the campaign finance reform ordinance/regulations), citing a desire to accelerate work before his departure. The motion was seconded.
Public commenters and local attorneys urged caution: Anita Mayo and others warned of constitutional challenges to contribution limits, and stakeholders urged building a record through interested-persons meetings. Commissioner Rennie and supporters said a draft ordinance and outside legal assistance already exist and that it was feasible to press the matter forward.
When the commission voted, the motion tied 2' 2; the chair noted that three votes were required to change the prioritization plan, so the motion failed and no action was taken. Commissioners discussed the possibility of arranging interested-persons meetings and doing legal pre-analysis without changing the formal priorities, and several commissioners volunteered to pursue stakeholder outreach.
