Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Online Political Ads topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ethics staff flags legal path to require political‑ad archives for online platforms; policy questions remain

San Francisco Ethics Commission · February 16, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff briefed commissioners on legal research by USC finding that a local requirement for a public political‑ad archive is unlikely to be preempted by state or federal law; Seattle and New York initiatives were discussed and staff outlined outstanding policy and technical questions before drafting enforceable local rules.

Ethics Commission staff reported on Feb. 16 that initial legal research suggests San Francisco could require archiving of online political advertisements without running afoul of state or federal preemption, but several policy and practical questions remain.

Professor Abby Wood of USC and her research team examined whether a local political‑file or archive requirement would be preempted by state or federal law. According to the staff briefing summarizing that work, the preemption risk appears limited. Staff noted, however, that implementing a local archive would raise operational questions — what formats platforms must retain, how to define “active support or opposition,” how to handle targeted micro‑ads, and how to scale a public‑facing archival system.

Seattle’s recent experience was cited as a live test case. Seattle enforced a decades‑old local political file requirement and sought information from platforms, including Facebook; staff said Seattle’s efforts and New York state interest (including proposals tied to the Honest Ads Act) provide instructive precedent but also highlight enforcement challenges.

Staff outlined a tentative research and stakeholder schedule and said it will consult academics, platforms, legal experts and civil‑liberties groups before drafting any local regulation.

What’s next: staff will continue the legal and policy work, convene stakeholder briefings, and return to the commission with draft recommendations and proposed technical specifications for any required archive or disclosure system.