Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Ethics commission deadlocks on finding that supervisor willfully ignored records request

San Francisco Ethics Commission · December 19, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The San Francisco Ethics Commission split 2-2 on whether to sustain a Sunshine Ordinance Task Force—finding that a supervisor willfully failed to respond to an immediate disclosure request dating to March 2015, leaving no formal willful finding after a contested hearing.

The San Francisco Ethics Commission on Dec. 19 declined to sustain a Sunshine Ordinance Task Force finding that a supervisor willfully failed to respond to an immediate disclosure request, after a 2-2 vote left the motion short of a majority.

Complainant Ray Hartz, director of San Francisco Open Government, told the commission he filed an immediate disclosure request (IDR) on March 19, 2015 and then spent more than a year seeking a response. He said the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force had found that the supervisor did not respond ‘‘in a timely and complete manner’’ and that the failure violated "section 67 21 E and 67 25 A of the…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans