Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Ethics commission deadlocks on finding that supervisor willfully ignored public-records request

San Francisco Ethics Commission · December 19, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The San Francisco Ethics Commission considered a Sunshine Ordinance Task Force referral alleging a supervisor failed to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request filed in March 2015; the commission split 2–2 on a motion to sustain the Task Force's finding of a willful violation and the motion failed.

The San Francisco Ethics Commission on Dec. 19 considered a Sunshine Ordinance Task Force referral alleging that a supervisor failed to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request (IDR) filed in March 2015 and that the delay amounted to a willful violation of the city's Sunshine Ordinance. The commission voted on a motion to sustain the Task Force's finding of willful violation but the motion failed on a 2–2 tie.

Complainant Ray Hartzbechter, who filed the original IDR and subsequent complaints, told the commission the supervisor's office did not provide a written response for "a year and four months" and repeatedly failed to appear at Task Force…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans