Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lobbyist Reform Ballot topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ethics Commission debates November ballot options to curb lobbyist gifts, contributions and bundling
Summary
Commission staff presented draft initiative language and two alternatives for a proposed November 2016 ballot measure to limit or ban lobbyist gifts (including travel), cap or ban contributions, and restrict bundling; Commissioners asked staff to draft a preregistration-based ban and an alternative low-dollar-limit approach for further review.
San Francisco—s Ethics Commission on June 27 continued work on a proposed initiative to curb lobbyist gifts, campaign contributions and the bundling of donations, with staff presenting draft ordinance language and commissioners directing staff to prepare two alternative proposals.
Staff outlined several recommendations: a stricter gift ban for lobbyists (removing the existing $25 de minimis exception and banning lobbyist-paid travel), new aggregate contribution limits for lobbyists (bracketed options of $250, $100 or $50 were shown in the draft), and rules to limit bundling by lobbyists so that transmission of others— contributions would count toward the lobbyist—s limit. Staff said the measure would also authorize Commission regulations to implement provisions, without creating exceptions to bans.
Commissioners and the City Attorney—s office repeatedly raised constitutional risk if measures were too broad. The City Attorney cautioned that a narrower, targeted approach that ties contribution bans to a preregistration (identifying officials a lobbyist intends to contact) is typically safer in court than an across-the-board ban. In response, the Commission asked staff to draft at least two alternatives for the July meeting: (1) a preregistration model under which lobbyists would pre-identify officials and be banned from contributing to those officials and bundling for them, and (2) a model without preregistration but with a significantly lowered dollar limit (discussion centered on $100) and explicit bundling caps.
Public comment included advocacy groups (Friends of Ethics, RepresentUs, California Common Cause, Human Services Network) urging inclusion of expenditure lobbyists, broad coverage of committees, and low limits (some recommended $50 or $100). Staff agreed to return with clarified gift-exemption language tied to state definitions, operational considerations for online lobbyist registration, and analysis of resource and technical implications for implementing preregistration.
Commissioners signaled concern about enforcement capacity, asked staff to examine online filing system changes, and asked the City Attorney and staff to weigh legal risk in drafting. The Commission did not finalize ballot language; staff will return in July with draft alternatives and implementation analysis for the November ballot timeline.
