Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Financing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ethics staff report: two supervisors'race candidates qualified for public financing in 2014, receiving about $195,000 combined

San Francisco Ethics Commission · February 23, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Assistant Deputy Director Shaista Shaikh briefed the commission on the 2014 supervisorial public financing report: eight candidates signaled interest, two met qualification thresholds and together received about $195,000; staff cautioned that program changes over time complicate pattern analysis.

Shaista Shaikh, Assistant Deputy Director for the Ethics Commission, presented the staff'prepared public financing report for the 2014 supervisorial races at the Feb. 23 meeting. The report covered the five even-numbered supervisorial districts on the November ballot. Shaikh said 17 candidates ran in those contests; eight expressed interest in public funds but only two qualified under the program's criteria and applied for public financing. Those two candidates, both from District 10, received a combined total of approximately $195,000.

Shaikh explained that the public-financing program has been amended several times since its adoption in 2002 (changes to qualification thresholds, deadlines and matching formulas), which makes it difficult to draw straightforward historical patterns from year to year. She described the supervisorial qualifying threshold for a non-incumbent candidate as raising at least $10,000 in qualifying contributions from at least 100 city residents in amounts between $10 and $100, plus meeting other filing and eligibility requirements.

Commissioners asked for context about why more candidates did not qualify; Shaikh reiterated that many potential applicants did not meet the qualifying threshold. Commissioners noted the relatively large sums public-financed candidates can receive and asked staff to clarify the program's operation and outreach in future meetings. There was no formal commission vote on the report; commissioners thanked staff for the thorough analysis and asked staff to be prepared to answer follow-ups at future meetings.