Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Ethics Commission urges Board to set threshold for permit-consultant fee disclosures

San Francisco Ethics Commission · December 16, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public comment from small permit consultants warning of competitive harm, the San Francisco Ethics Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a monetary threshold at which permit-consultant fees must be disclosed, passing the recommendation 3'01.

The San Francisco Ethics Commission voted to recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt a monetary threshold for disclosure of permit-consultant fees, saying a floor would balance transparency and the competitive concerns raised by small consultants.

The recommendation grew out of public comment from consultants and their attorney who said a drafting error left fee disclosure language in the ordinance the Board had intended to remove. Ryan Patterson, an attorney representing mainly small "mom-and-pop" permit consultants, told commissioners that public, per-client disclosure of modest consulting fees would provide "no public benefit" while allowing large competitors to undercut small firms. "Disclosing the permit consultants generally very small fees to the public provides no public benefit that we can see," he said.

Several permit consultants described their day-to-day work to the commission. Jeremy Paul…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans