Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Ethics commission, Sunshine Task Force debate who should enforce non‑willful Sunshine Ordinance violations

Ethics Commission and Sunshine Ordinance Task Force · April 13, 2012
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a joint meeting, the Ethics Commission and Sunshine Ordinance Task Force debated whether the commission should hear and enforce non‑willful violations and settled on pursuing an expedited 'show‑cause' enforcement track while staff reworks regulations.

At a joint meeting of the Ethics Commission and the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, commissioners and task force members debated whether the commission should accept and enforce non‑willful violations of San Francisco’s Sunshine Ordinance and how enforcement should be structured.

The discussion centered on differing readings of ordinance sections 67.34, 67.35 and 67.30(c). Alan Grossman, a pro bono attorney working with the task force, told the meeting the staff’s November draft “was dramatic and shocking” because it reversed policy decisions reached earlier without the policy body present and, in his view, staff “is not authorized and empowered to reverse those decisions; only the Ethics Commission can do that.”

Commission Chair Ben Hur said he supported a procedure that would speed resolution of non‑willful enforcement…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans