Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Change Of Use Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves easing plan requirements for limited change‑of‑use permits, with disability advocates warning of risks
Summary
The commission unanimously approved file 240798 to allow certain change‑of‑use permits (no occupancy increase, no alterations) to proceed without professionally prepared architectural plans. Disability advocates raised concerns that the change could enable unpermitted work that circumvents accessibility requirements.
The Building Inspection Commission voted unanimously to recommend Board of Supervisors file 240798, which exempts some changes of use from the requirement to submit professionally prepared architectural plans when there is no increase in occupant load, no occupancy class change, and no physical alterations to mechanical, electrical or plumbing systems.
Katie Tang of the Office of Small Business said the substitute legislation grew from a pilot program intended to make it easier for small businesses to change use (for example, obtaining a liquor license where no construction is required) by allowing dimensioned diagrams instead of full architectural plans. "If it's simply a planning code change of use ... and again, no alterations ... then it really shouldn't have to go before DBI," Tang said, describing procedural fixes including routing at the permit center and DBI checks.
William Railing of Accessible San Francisco urged caution, saying the change could create an incentive for tenant alterations to proceed without verified accessibility improvements. "This program ... all one needs to do is claim that you're not doing any tenant improvements, and you get this relief from having proper architectural plans done at all," Railing said, adding the disability subcommittee and code advisory committee had expressed concerns during prior reviews.
Commissioners asked how DBI will verify no occupancy increase and how inspections will catch unreported changes. DBI staff said the permit routing process and inspection touchpoints remain, and that for cases where a permit still issues, an inspector will visit and flag noncompliance.
Commissioner Newman moved and Commissioner Williams seconded to approve the ordinance; the commission voted unanimously.
Next steps: the recommendation will be transmitted to the Board of Supervisors as file 240798. Commissioners requested an update on pilot outcomes, and one commissioner asked DBI for a progress report by the end of the first quarter following implementation.
