Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tenant Protections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission votes to reenact emergency ordinance protecting tenants from construction-related utility interruptions

San Francisco Building Inspection Commission · February 17, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Commission recommended reenactment of a 60‑day emergency ordinance requiring project sponsors to provide alternative water/electric service or advance notice when construction would disrupt tenants' utilities, citing pandemic-era shelter-in-place concerns.

The Building Inspection Commission voted unanimously to recommend reenactment of a 60‑day emergency ordinance that limits construction projects that would interrupt water or electricity to residential tenants without providing alternatives or written advance notice.

Staff presentation: Lee Hepner (staff) summarized the reenactment text (original file 200,763). The ordinance requires an alternative supply if interruptions exceed two hours in a single day and requires 72 hours’ notice for interruptions totaling more than two hours (and one week for outages lasting more than three days in a week). The reenactment excludes affordable housing projects by policy and is implemented as a complaint-driven enforcement sequence: initial tenant complaint yields a warning to the project sponsor, follow-up notice requirements, and, if violations continue, a notice of violation from DBI.

Why it matters: The measure aims to protect tenants who must shelter in place during the COVID-19 pandemic from repeated or prolonged loss of essential services. Staff reported that during the original 60‑day implementation period there were about 14 complaints under the ordinance.

Outcome: The Commission voted unanimously to recommend reenacting the emergency ordinance for another 60 days and to forward the recommendation to the Board of Supervisors’ committee for consideration.

Ending: The emergency reenactment will remain in place while staff and the Board consider whether a longer-term or permanent ordinance is necessary.