Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environmental Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DPH briefs commission on Maher map triggers and site‑mitigation process under Health Code Article 22A

Building Inspection Commission · September 16, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Department of Public Health staff reviewed Health Code Article 22A (the Maher program), explaining triggers for review (50+ cubic‑yard soil disturbance, proximity to USTs/elevated roadways), required submittals (Phase I/II, mitigation plans), typical analytes tested and timeframes for review.

Health Department staff Ryan Casey and Mandu Awad presented a technical overview of San Francisco Health Code Article 22A (the Maher program). They described the Maher map and the triggers that require site investigation: disturbance of at least 50 cubic yards of soil in areas within 100 feet of a current or former underground storage tank, within 150 feet of a current or former elevated roadway, or other site history indicators such as Bay Fill or listings in state contamination databases.

Casey outlined the typical sequential submittals for a site: application and fee, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Phase II subsurface investigation, site mitigation plan, final implementation report and -- when needed -- land‑use covenants or deed restrictions. Typical analyses requested include Title‑22 metals, volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, methane and asbestos or pesticides if site history suggests them. He said routine review timing is usually within 30 days but complex excavation and mitigation projects can take longer because DBH waits for proponents' resubmittals and mitigation plans.

Commissioners asked whether mitigation monitoring continues through project life and whether tenants and the public receive summary reports. Staff said remediation systems often require deed restrictions with maintenance plans, periodic inspections and reporting; final No Further Action letters and summaries become part of the public record and can be made available to tenants upon request.